CRO Consulting
About Varify
Contact
Blog
Webinars Live
Success Stories
Card Set
Varify.io
Functions Pricing For agencies Try for free
Get a demo

A/B Testing Pricing Models Explained — Understanding What You Actually Pay For

Niko Kerter
Niko Kerter
·Updated May 2026
2,700+ companies worldwide
4.8/5 on OMR Reviews
GDPR compliant — no cookies
Flat-rate from €149/mo
Key Takeaways
  • A/B testing tools use five distinct pricing models: MTU-based, impression-based, visitor-based, flat-rate, and free/open-source
  • Understanding the model matters more than the starting price — the cheapest entry point often becomes the most expensive at scale
  • Flat-rate pricing (Varify: from €149/mo) is the only model where costs are fully decoupled from traffic and usage
  • Annual contracts and hidden multipliers (seat fees, overage charges) make direct price comparison misleading without TCO analysis

A/B testing pricing is deliberately confusing. Tools use different metrics (MTU, impressions, visitors, pageviews), different billing cycles (monthly, annual-only, custom), and different feature gates (basic vs. premium tiers) — making direct comparison nearly impossible without understanding the underlying model. This guide decodes each pricing model so you can calculate real costs, not just compare sticker prices.

Varify.io uses flat-rate pricing — the simplest model to understand and budget for. But we'll cover all models fairly, including where alternatives might be cheaper for specific scenarios.

The 5 A/B testing pricing models

1. MTU-based (Monthly Tracked Users)

Used by VWO. You pay based on how many unique visitors interact with experiments each month. Sounds fair — but "tracked users" is opaque: does a visitor who returns 3 times count as 1 or 3? The definition varies and always favors the vendor. Costs scale linearly with traffic.

2. Impression-based

Used by Optimizely. You pay per experiment impression (each time a visitor sees a variant). This double-charges: a visitor in 3 concurrent experiments generates 3 impressions. The more you test, the more you pay — punishing high testing velocity.

3. Visitor-based

Used by Convert, Crazy Egg. Similar to MTU but counted differently. Typically based on tested visitors (only those in active experiments, not all site visitors). More predictable than MTU but still scales with traffic.

4. Flat-rate

Used by Varify.io. One price regardless of traffic, experiments, or team members. From €149/mo (Growth, 5 active experiments) or from €249/mo (Pro, unlimited). The only model where costs are fully predictable.

5. Free / open-source

Used by GrowthBook. Zero licensing cost, self-hosted. Costs shift from subscription to developer time: setup, maintenance, troubleshooting, updates. "Free" in price, not in total cost of ownership.

Real cost comparison across models

Traffic levelVarify (flat)VWO (MTU)Convert (visitor)GrowthBook (free)
50K/mo€149/mo~$300/mo~$99/mo$0 + dev time
200K/mo€149/mo~$500/mo~$299/mo$0 + dev time
500K/mo€149/mo~$800/mo~$399+/mo$0 + dev time
1M/mo€149/mo~$1,200+/mo~$699+/mo$0 + dev time

Source: Claude Research, May 2026. VWO/Convert estimates based on published tiers and industry benchmarks.

At 50K visitors, Convert is cheapest commercially. At 200K+, Varify overtakes every paid alternative. The crossover happens quickly for growing companies.

Hidden cost multipliers to watch for

The starting price is never the full picture. Watch for these hidden multipliers:

One price. Everything included. No surprises.

From €149/mo flat-rate. See all plans at varify.io/en/plans.

Start your free trialFree 30-day trial

Choosing the right pricing model for your team

Match the pricing model to your situation:

For most teams between 50K and 2M visitors, flat-rate pricing delivers the best combination of predictability, value, and growth-friendliness. Start with a free 30-day Varify trial to see it in practice.

Frequently asked questions about A/B testing pricing models

What does MTU mean in A/B testing pricing?

MTU stands for Monthly Tracked Users — the number of unique visitors who interact with experiments during a billing month. VWO uses this metric. The exact definition of "tracked" varies by vendor and can include visitors who merely load the testing script, not just those actively in experiments. This opacity makes budgeting difficult.

Why do enterprise tools hide their pricing?

Custom pricing lets vendors maximize revenue per customer by assessing willingness to pay during sales conversations. A company with a $50K budget pays $45K; one with $20K pays $18K. Same product, different prices. Published pricing (Varify, Convert) eliminates this dynamic — everyone pays the same rate.

Is annual billing always cheaper than monthly?

Usually yes — annual billing typically offers 15-30% savings. Varify's annual billing saves ~25% (Growth: €149 vs €199/mo; Pro: €249 vs €349/mo). But annual billing locks you in. If you're evaluating, start monthly and switch to annual once you've confirmed the tool fits.

How do I calculate the true cost of a CRO tool?

True cost = (monthly plan × 12) + (seat fees × team size × 12) + (overage risk × estimated overages) + (setup fees) + (migration cost). For Varify: (€149 × 12) + (€0) + (€0) + (€0) + (minimal) = ~€1,788/year. For traffic-based tools, the overage risk alone can double the calculated cost.